From The Englishness of English Art, by Nikolaus Pevsner, Peregrine/Penguin 1988, p 29
Above is the sketch as it appears, correctly, in The Englishness of English Art: BBC Reith Lectures: an illustrated guide. This is a pamphlet prepared in May 1955, to accompany Pevsner's original series of talks "broadcast weekly from 16 October to 27 November, 1955". Thornhill's annotated drawing for the arrival of George I differs greatly from the final grisaille in the Painted Hall. "Note, the upper end of the hall where the royal family is painted, was left chiefly to the pencil of Mr Andrea a foreigner, after the payment originally agreed upon for the work was so much reduced, as made it not worth Sir James's while to finish the whole with his own more masterly hand." Paulson notes of Andrea: "Dietrich Ernst, a Pole, c 1680-1734?" Hogarth: Analysis of Beauty, 1753, ed 1997, p 92. Victoria Navales The leap from 1588 to 1692 omits Stuart rule; but also the Interregnum, and the victories of Blake. At this period Thornhill presumably considered it circumspect to avoid stirring memories of Cromwell and the Protectorate, solving the problem by omitting any reference to this painful period. Any reminiscences of conflict with the Dutch are also swept away. Discomfiture of Spain and France, as well as the pretensions of the Pretender, on the other hand, are recorded with relish. When visiting the Hall in the company of an academic colleague, he expressed puzzlement over the reference to Edinburgh. A forgotten episode, considered of signal importance at the time. See also here. the painted hall © Charles Harrison Wallace 2005 |